> Your position betrays an ignorance of philosophy
And your entire reply rests on misreading of my comment; note that I said "a problem" not "all problems". There are many problems that philosophists have made absolutely no progress on in centuries or millenia because on those narrow questions the dialog is horribly imprecise and does not give rise to reproducible, testable things.
Almost everyone who replied to me assumed that I meant all of philosophy is useless from basically missing the "a" word in my comment.
And your entire reply rests on misreading of my comment; note that I said "a problem" not "all problems". There are many problems that philosophists have made absolutely no progress on in centuries or millenia because on those narrow questions the dialog is horribly imprecise and does not give rise to reproducible, testable things.
Almost everyone who replied to me assumed that I meant all of philosophy is useless from basically missing the "a" word in my comment.