Isn't it typical to release the paper first, for peer vetting, ahead of any actual working proof?
It seems like the only reason for the "put up or shut up" reactions is that "destroys RSA" comment in the submitted abstract...which isn't in the actual paper.
It seems like the only reason for the "put up or shut up" reactions is that "destroys RSA" comment in the submitted abstract...which isn't in the actual paper.