I really can't make up my mind. On the one hand, it's truly unhealthy for the overall job security and the social construct (which is normal given it's modelled after the US).
But on the other hand, it would have been a fucking travesty doing a lockdown without ordering on Uber eats and Co.
And those platforms were the innovators in the space. Restaurants who could develop similar platforms would have never allocated the money, and others who would never have had the opportunity to offer such services, would have never tapped the overall market (i.e. People with Internet who are hungry and need food for any reason, be it no groceries or just laziness).
But on the other hand, it would have been a fucking travesty doing a lockdown without ordering on Uber eats and Co.
And those platforms were the innovators in the space. Restaurants who could develop similar platforms would have never allocated the money, and others who would never have had the opportunity to offer such services, would have never tapped the overall market (i.e. People with Internet who are hungry and need food for any reason, be it no groceries or just laziness).
Can't there be some sort of middle ground ?