> We’d really appreciate it if you try it out and give us feedback.
The landing page is gorgeous. Re the service: IDK, on the one side it's amazing, on the other hand, key to significant cost savings is to use Google and AWS only for must-have services, otherwise avoid them as much as possible and deploy the rest on self-managed k8s-clusters on vps farms. Latter might not work for huge deployments like Fortnite's server park but creates a very competitive performance-to-cost-ratio for small to medium deployments.[1] Not sure how this would fit in your design but just my two cents.
Also, once you fully locked-in yourself into a cloud provider real cost-savings get harder and harder. If your tool is just about forecasting for finance and controlling then it's sufficient.
[1] If your business model is so good (like Fortnite's) you shouldn't obsess about cloud costs, going all-in with AWS and Google might be the better choice.
The landing page is gorgeous. Re the service: IDK, on the one side it's amazing, on the other hand, key to significant cost savings is to use Google and AWS only for must-have services, otherwise avoid them as much as possible and deploy the rest on self-managed k8s-clusters on vps farms. Latter might not work for huge deployments like Fortnite's server park but creates a very competitive performance-to-cost-ratio for small to medium deployments.[1] Not sure how this would fit in your design but just my two cents.
Also, once you fully locked-in yourself into a cloud provider real cost-savings get harder and harder. If your tool is just about forecasting for finance and controlling then it's sufficient.
[1] If your business model is so good (like Fortnite's) you shouldn't obsess about cloud costs, going all-in with AWS and Google might be the better choice.