does the entire team participate in the interview process and make a hire / no hire decision as a team?
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I've heard people at Bloomberg in London complain about this in the past; people have said to me they've found good candidates but because one person on the team said no, it's a no hire, and they ended up hiring someone whose distinguishing feature is "nobody actively disliked them as a candidate".
I guess it's a good thing if nobody has an individual veto; I understand in the case above anyone on the team could individually veto.
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I've heard people at Bloomberg in London complain about this in the past; people have said to me they've found good candidates but because one person on the team said no, it's a no hire, and they ended up hiring someone whose distinguishing feature is "nobody actively disliked them as a candidate".
I guess it's a good thing if nobody has an individual veto; I understand in the case above anyone on the team could individually veto.