> I know expat Jamaican and Dominican communities in New York that celebrate festivals yearly.
And I would not call those Anglo-Saxon as they are actual expats of a different ethnicity and recent-generation immigrants?
That you even consider those comparable to Anglo-Saxon African-Americans that are not recent immigrants but have lived in the U.S.A.. from six generations back is baffling to me.
> nor is the creole language and culture practiced around New Orleans and Louisiana.
Nor would I call those Anglo-Saxon.
You seem to cast very different populations, that speak very different languages and have very different cultural practices, in the same bucket, simply because of a shared skin color.
There are indeed populations of any color in the U.S.A. that are decidedly not Anglo-Saxon. I would no more call recent black Jamaican immigrants Anglo-Saxon than I would recent white Italian immigrants, but the vast majority of population of any color in the U.S.A. is decidedly Anglo-Saxon and has been nurtured within an Anglo-Saxon milieu for generations.
And I would not call those Anglo-Saxon as they are actual expats of a different ethnicity and recent-generation immigrants?
That you even consider those comparable to Anglo-Saxon African-Americans that are not recent immigrants but have lived in the U.S.A.. from six generations back is baffling to me.
> nor is the creole language and culture practiced around New Orleans and Louisiana.
Nor would I call those Anglo-Saxon.
You seem to cast very different populations, that speak very different languages and have very different cultural practices, in the same bucket, simply because of a shared skin color.
There are indeed populations of any color in the U.S.A. that are decidedly not Anglo-Saxon. I would no more call recent black Jamaican immigrants Anglo-Saxon than I would recent white Italian immigrants, but the vast majority of population of any color in the U.S.A. is decidedly Anglo-Saxon and has been nurtured within an Anglo-Saxon milieu for generations.