I mean, Facebook de-platformized a politician that 70+ million people voted for.
It doesn't really matter if they had the right or wrong reasons in doing this: the pool of disillusioned people just grew tremendously and I can't see anyone claiming otherwise.
Or did Facebook think that all of these 70+ million people would just sit back quietly and accept that their politician was blocked (or perceived of being censored)?
EDIT: Clarified the last sentence do to using the word "censored" incorrectly: thanks for pointing it out.
I mean, Facebook de-platformized a politician that 70+ million people voted for.
It doesn't really matter if they had the right or wrong reasons in doing this: the pool of disillusioned people just grew tremendously and I can't see anyone claiming otherwise.
Or did Facebook think that all of these 70+ million people would just sit back quietly and accept that their politician was blocked (or perceived of being censored)?
EDIT: Clarified the last sentence do to using the word "censored" incorrectly: thanks for pointing it out.