> Look at Ted Kaczynski, a terrorist with some very strange ideas. Although he had freedom of speech, he had no means to get his ideas out in front of more people. He had to resort to extreme measures
So like, Ted Kaczynski was basically victim and world owned him millions of views? And when Ted Kaczynski cant get those millions of views, he "has to resort" to killing people?
And if Ted Kaczynski had youtube channel and the channel would be ignored, would he still be entitled to kill people to get more views?
So like, Ted Kaczynski was basically victim and world owned him millions of views? And when Ted Kaczynski cant get those millions of views, he "has to resort" to killing people?
And if Ted Kaczynski had youtube channel and the channel would be ignored, would he still be entitled to kill people to get more views?