Comment by nicktorba

Seems like there is just a general lack of emphasis on the improvements that have been made.

It makes sense that progress cycles from a big breakthroughs to years of seeing how far we can push it.

Even so, the world is significantly different than it was in ‘96. “Stagnation” doesn’t feel like the right word.

What about advances in quantum computing? Is that not a large enough paradigm shift for the author to acknowledge?