Quoting: "I’m concerned that people interpret your conjectures as facts.". Harris the author is a Phd candidate in biology at Stanford who is calling out Levitt, a Nobel Prize winning structural biologist at Stanford, for his evidently non-scientifically based popular COVID advice "in keeping with your hostility to epidemiology". Harris maintains Levitt is doing damage, real damage to public health, to his reputation, and the reputation of Stanford. I am just some random, but I was persuaded by her reasoned and pointed argument. Her article took some guts to write. I hope it is constructively received. I would be curious to understand what is driving Levitt.
EDIT: adding a link to an interview w/ Levitt from 8/20: https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/08/02/qa-michael-levitt-o...