Comment Comment by Isinlor Does this article actually contains explanation of what was wrong with the original study?Maybe I don't know how to read with understanding, but to me this article makes only two points:1. The effect was about all people, not just dumb people.2. The same graph can be obtained "by random".Point 1. makes sense, but 2. is left unexplained. There is a lot of words, but no content. Almost as if GPT-3 was writing it :) . parent Isinlor 5 years ago
Maybe I don't know how to read with understanding, but to me this article makes only two points:
1. The effect was about all people, not just dumb people.
2. The same graph can be obtained "by random".
Point 1. makes sense, but 2. is left unexplained. There is a lot of words, but no content. Almost as if GPT-3 was writing it :) .