I wouldn't reject this out of hand, but I do find that the complexities around healthcare and the obvious political implications lead to a lot of exaggeration and outright falsehoods being propagated.
it's my understanding that the affordable care act requires insurers to treat any emergency services (if covered at all) as in-network. can anyone explain either a.) how I am wrong, or b.) how this can be circumvented?
it's my understanding that the affordable care act requires insurers to treat any emergency services (if covered at all) as in-network. can anyone explain either a.) how I am wrong, or b.) how this can be circumvented?