Well, except from begging the question when saying that violently smashing object is violence, at least the WHO disagrees, for which violence is "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation.", where property damage doesn't qualify as violence.
Also, in judicial systems where the distinction exists, vandalism is generally considered a non-violent crime.
Also, in judicial systems where the distinction exists, vandalism is generally considered a non-violent crime.