Your argument jumps around. By the time Steve Jobs returned to Apple he had near total control: yet a central point of your argument was that idealistic founders have trouble when they sign away rights.
And Job, though he did many wonderful things, had sociopathic tendencies from even before he founded Apple.
As for Facebook, Zuckerberg has maintained a very large amount of control. How does this square with your thesis that the trouble comes from VC’s?
And Job, though he did many wonderful things, had sociopathic tendencies from even before he founded Apple.
As for Facebook, Zuckerberg has maintained a very large amount of control. How does this square with your thesis that the trouble comes from VC’s?