Comment

Comment by kickscondor

I think there is a lack of imagination here.

Perhaps a "social graph" shouldn't belong to any company. The concept itself might be anti-privacy.

Perhaps it's time to move back to simpler things like OPML. (Which people seem more comfortable sharing freely - not sure if that's still a "social graph" tho.)

Perhaps specific relationship details shouldn't be housed in the social network - just the permission to follow.

Perhaps companies who house a "social graph" should be regulated - similar to what is done with medical data. It should be a toxic substance.

I just think we're a long way from doing this right and there are a lot of untried options - and I lack imagination as well.

parent kickscondor 6 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton