> It literally makes things faster, cheaper, more secure.
How? I'm pretty sure if this was true, everyone would be using it for database work now, except no one does. So these claims are baseless.
> Bitcoin's blockchain will disrupt (evolve) something. The leading use case is a store of value. If that is to be adopted then bitcoin's value will be in the trillions.
Evolve what? You don't even seem to be sure and are just guessing that it's novel and surely has some value, but you don't know why. Trillions? Where do you get this number from? Do you somehow take the size of an existing market and assign a value per consumer? Where is the rigor behind your claims?
How? I'm pretty sure if this was true, everyone would be using it for database work now, except no one does. So these claims are baseless.
> Bitcoin's blockchain will disrupt (evolve) something. The leading use case is a store of value. If that is to be adopted then bitcoin's value will be in the trillions.
Evolve what? You don't even seem to be sure and are just guessing that it's novel and surely has some value, but you don't know why. Trillions? Where do you get this number from? Do you somehow take the size of an existing market and assign a value per consumer? Where is the rigor behind your claims?