>Interestingly, someone only observing results of a probabilistic event will eventually learn to predict events with an accuracy approaching ideal
This relies on various unstated assumptions.
I would deny the assumption that an event can be probablistic in nature. There are only ever predictions. The distinction between a probablistic world and a deterministic world is incoherent.
This relies on various unstated assumptions.
I would deny the assumption that an event can be probablistic in nature. There are only ever predictions. The distinction between a probablistic world and a deterministic world is incoherent.