Of course every Indian source stated that India were on the side of justice, just like Chinese media also gave a bias in favor of China. The thing is, there's no way to know which side is telling the truth. None of their sources can be considered credible on this.
You can try keeping only the "facts" as described by the Indian media in the corresponding Wikipedia entry[1] and see if others agree. My point is: You can't just assert that a unilateral statement is a fact.
> They captured few villages from neighboring country Nepal
"Nepal government says Nepal doesn't have border dispute with China"[2]
"Nepal denies claims of construction by Chinese side within its territory"[3]
Your news sources don't look that credible.
In fact, not only are there no disputes between Nepal and China, but instead there are disputes between Nepal and India.[4]
Of course every Indian source stated that India were on the side of justice, just like Chinese media also gave a bias in favor of China. The thing is, there's no way to know which side is telling the truth. None of their sources can be considered credible on this.
You can try keeping only the "facts" as described by the Indian media in the corresponding Wikipedia entry[1] and see if others agree. My point is: You can't just assert that a unilateral statement is a fact.
> They captured few villages from neighboring country Nepal
"Nepal government says Nepal doesn't have border dispute with China"[2]
"Nepal denies claims of construction by Chinese side within its territory"[3]
Your news sources don't look that credible.
In fact, not only are there no disputes between Nepal and China, but instead there are disputes between Nepal and India.[4]
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_China%E2%80%93India_skirm...
[2]: https://reddit.com/r/Nepal/comments/iybcbj/nepal_government_...
[3]: https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/nepal-denies-claims-of-c...
[4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Nepal_border#Bor...