> The whole system looks reasonable except for how easy it can be for poll workers to know what you voted for.
I was struck when the article said they were asking party affiliation before voting.
>> The voter approaches their table, and gives their name and party affiliation. The party affiliation is used as a signal that something fishy might be going on if the ratio of R to D is very different from the votes recorded.
Wtf? You can vote in secret but you gotta tell us who you voted with?
I was struck when the article said they were asking party affiliation before voting.
>> The voter approaches their table, and gives their name and party affiliation. The party affiliation is used as a signal that something fishy might be going on if the ratio of R to D is very different from the votes recorded.
Wtf? You can vote in secret but you gotta tell us who you voted with?