I don't know, Discogs may have better info for
the releases it has, but my experience is that the completeness of their data is pretty spotty.
For example, lots of popular artists in Japan (not trying to cherry pick something obscure; Japan after all has the second largest music industry in the world) don't even have an article there, let alone a complete discography.
This is obviously due to lack of volunteers, or their volunteers have limited areas of interest, which is totally understandable. But I think some basic automatic systems to at least add the new releases from major labels is needed for such database.
I personally have a better experience on https://musicbrainz.org/. It suffers the similar problem mentioned above, but much better. At least most of "mainstream" artists I checked, it has complete or close to complete discography. It is also a more "ambitious" database, which has data for each track, recording (my fav part), etc.
For example, lots of popular artists in Japan (not trying to cherry pick something obscure; Japan after all has the second largest music industry in the world) don't even have an article there, let alone a complete discography.
This is obviously due to lack of volunteers, or their volunteers have limited areas of interest, which is totally understandable. But I think some basic automatic systems to at least add the new releases from major labels is needed for such database.
I personally have a better experience on https://musicbrainz.org/. It suffers the similar problem mentioned above, but much better. At least most of "mainstream" artists I checked, it has complete or close to complete discography. It is also a more "ambitious" database, which has data for each track, recording (my fav part), etc.