> Why would they want some photos of my face? What do they have to gain? That seems like the least of my concerns
I honestly do not understand this line of reasoning. It's unjustifiable. I mean, here we have an attack vector with a colossal potential to do you harm, and here you are arguing against a basic safety measure because you're able to think about other attack vectors? How does that even start to make any sense?
I honestly do not understand this line of reasoning. It's unjustifiable. I mean, here we have an attack vector with a colossal potential to do you harm, and here you are arguing against a basic safety measure because you're able to think about other attack vectors? How does that even start to make any sense?