Dr. W. M. Stuckey shows that the origin of quantum entanglement is none other than Einstein's own Principle of Relativity (No Preferred Frame of Reference).
Einstein's famous 1905 paper on Relativity applied this principle to Translational Frames, showing it requires the Universal constant c (speed of light) to be the same in all such frames. Were it not, the frame in which c was highest would be the only frame at rest.
But the same principle must require there to be no Preferred Orientation. This leads to the requirement that Planck's constant h be the same in all frames. If the Stern-Gerlach experiment could give results between +h and -h, then the orientation producing the maximum value would be a preferred frame.
And because of that, when Alice and Bob measure entangled quantum particles, their combined results must violate Bell's inequality.
But to my mind, the biggest take-away is that Einstein's Principle of Relativity absolutely requires that conservation can only be on average.
All right, that's a ridiculously condensed summary. Enough to make your head spin :-)
The title paper is for general audiences, and references the original paper at
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72817-7.pdf
Einstein's famous 1905 paper on Relativity applied this principle to Translational Frames, showing it requires the Universal constant c (speed of light) to be the same in all such frames. Were it not, the frame in which c was highest would be the only frame at rest.
But the same principle must require there to be no Preferred Orientation. This leads to the requirement that Planck's constant h be the same in all frames. If the Stern-Gerlach experiment could give results between +h and -h, then the orientation producing the maximum value would be a preferred frame.
And because of that, when Alice and Bob measure entangled quantum particles, their combined results must violate Bell's inequality.
But to my mind, the biggest take-away is that Einstein's Principle of Relativity absolutely requires that conservation can only be on average.
All right, that's a ridiculously condensed summary. Enough to make your head spin :-)
The title paper is for general audiences, and references the original paper at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72817-7.pdf