Does this blog post even contain evidence of the court's leaning? From what I gathered yesterday, the court was hesitant to shake up the software industry. This post seems to just contain the author's hunch/desire?
Also, it'sincredibly condescending, calling people who don't think APIs should be copyrightable "morons" and "stupid".
Also, it'sincredibly condescending, calling people who don't think APIs should be copyrightable "morons" and "stupid".