> profoundly grandiose, overconfident, and dishonest, credit-stealing, and blame-throwing, according to Chatman. They are abusive to their subordinates, think they are superior, don’t listen to experts, create conflict, and believe the rules simply don’t apply to them
How do you objectively study such a thing? How do you tell when credit is stolen or blame underserved as an outside researcher? How do you determine who is abusive, but for those that do it out in the open (such that Bill Gates is a counterexample); how can you talk about what people believe?
> profoundly grandiose, overconfident, and dishonest, credit-stealing, and blame-throwing, according to Chatman. They are abusive to their subordinates, think they are superior, don’t listen to experts, create conflict, and believe the rules simply don’t apply to them
How do you objectively study such a thing? How do you tell when credit is stolen or blame underserved as an outside researcher? How do you determine who is abusive, but for those that do it out in the open (such that Bill Gates is a counterexample); how can you talk about what people believe?