What's incredibly insane here, is that "low usage" is the excuse being used to terminate an accessibility feature. Accessibility features will always be low usage, but it's still important to provide them.
This is kinda like a restaurant removing their handicapped ramp because it's "not used often". Of course, that'd be illegal.
This is kinda like a restaurant removing their handicapped ramp because it's "not used often". Of course, that'd be illegal.