Not having it funded by the tax payer is not the same as outlawing it.
This all comes down to whether critical race theory is truly an unacceptable set of ideas, like e.g frenology, or not, that should be legitimately banned.
Should be easy to make an honest defense of that point if this is indeed the case?
This all comes down to whether critical race theory is truly an unacceptable set of ideas, like e.g frenology, or not, that should be legitimately banned.
Should be easy to make an honest defense of that point if this is indeed the case?