Comment

Comment by acoard

>I think we can kind of view obscurity in the same way. It's a way to signal to a predator that we're a hard target and that they should give up.

This has it completely backwards. Security through obscurity's goal is not to signal predators, it's the opposite. The goal is to obscure, to hide. The "signal" is there is nothing here (or nothing here worth your time). One of the best examples (it's in the article!) is changing the default SSH port. Just by obscuring your port you can usually filter out the majority of break-in attempts.

The only way security through obscurity signals to "predators" is if they've seen past your defence, and thus defeated the obscurity. Obscurity (once revealed) is not a deterrent. Likewise an authentication method (once exploited) is not a deterrent.

>Of course in the age of automation, relying on obscurity alone is foolish because once someone has automated an attack that defeats the obscurity, then it is little or no effort for an attacker to bypass it.

This is true of any exploit basically. Look no further than metasploit. Another example: a worm is a self-automating exploit.

parent acoard 6 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton