My takeaway: in-person leadership is a charisma game where somebody fools everyone into letting them be boss. Perhaps to the detriment of the project and goals.
Virtual leadership is based on performance and productivity. It related directly to achieving goals.
Another big win for virtual work? It factors pointless, harmful charisma out of the equation?
Virtual leadership is based on performance and productivity. It related directly to achieving goals.
Another big win for virtual work? It factors pointless, harmful charisma out of the equation?