I'd suggest that no one has to ask if PandaDoc's leadership is acting recklessly by speaking. Because the alternative is complicity. It is absolutely dangerous to speak, though, you're right about that. The danger exists regardless of whether their leadership speaks. The difference is timing.
Yes, it is dangerous. But the party making it unsafe is the fascists. Outrage should be directed there.
Yes, it is dangerous. But the party making it unsafe is the fascists. Outrage should be directed there.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/martin-nie...