One thing I've always wondered about when it comes to the temporary nature of US presidential terms and their respective administrations - why does it seem like it's so much easier to dismantle things than to create them in the first place?
Especially for things that took a substantial amount of time and effort to build, shouldn't we require much more scrutiny before considering an action that effectively dismantles/dissovles/destroys
them? Instead it feels more like we are at the mercy of the whims of whoever is the current temp-employee-in-chief.
Especially for things that took a substantial amount of time and effort to build, shouldn't we require much more scrutiny before considering an action that effectively dismantles/dissovles/destroys them? Instead it feels more like we are at the mercy of the whims of whoever is the current temp-employee-in-chief.