Comment Comment by saagarjha With a heavy heart I join the rest of the zsh discussion because these aren’t even factual:> You can do a lot of advanced things with bash, and customize it to do even more, but ZSH allows you to do even more.Bash can do a lot of things zsh can’t, and vice versa.> Fish is a nice shell (probably nicer than ZSH), but realistically it was not a real consideration due to the fact that it is not POSIX compatible.Neither is zsh, really. There’s emulation modes but I never got the impression that fidelity was a goal there. parent saagarjha 6 years ago
> You can do a lot of advanced things with bash, and customize it to do even more, but ZSH allows you to do even more.
Bash can do a lot of things zsh can’t, and vice versa.
> Fish is a nice shell (probably nicer than ZSH), but realistically it was not a real consideration due to the fact that it is not POSIX compatible.
Neither is zsh, really. There’s emulation modes but I never got the impression that fidelity was a goal there.