which isn't surprising because virtually all of the questions are so simple they could literally appear in the training data that GPT-3 was trained on. I'm a little tired of proving how "intelligent" GPT is by asking these superficial questions.
the MIT article gives much better examples that actually require physical, biological or higher-level reasoning and it produces complete nonsense as one would expect.
which isn't surprising because virtually all of the questions are so simple they could literally appear in the training data that GPT-3 was trained on. I'm a little tired of proving how "intelligent" GPT is by asking these superficial questions.
the MIT article gives much better examples that actually require physical, biological or higher-level reasoning and it produces complete nonsense as one would expect.