An almost meaningless number when not controlled for age, ethnicity, general health etc.
I don't understand how this number can be reasonably used to say anything about basically anything.
From the document you site:
> Many such serological surveys are currently being
> undertaken worldwide [10], and some have thus far
> suggested substantial under-ascertainment of cases, with estimates of IFR converging at approximately 0.5 - 1% [10-12].
But if we follow reference 12, we get the following IFR study from Stockholm[1]:
> Results:
> Age 0–69 Population %: 88.3, IFR: 0.09%
> Age 70+, Population %: 11.7, IFR: 4.29%
Now, which number applies to the vast majority of us? And this is not even controlled for anything but age.
People, come on.
1. https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/53c0dc391b...
I don't understand how this number can be reasonably used to say anything about basically anything.
From the document you site:
But if we follow reference 12, we get the following IFR study from Stockholm[1]: Now, which number applies to the vast majority of us? And this is not even controlled for anything but age.People, come on.
1. https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/53c0dc391b...