> Should intersex conditions be considered normal human genetic variances (like eye colour), or genetic disorders (like Down Syndrome)?
Doesn't really matter, for this purpose.
> I’d argue that humans are indeed binary sexed, and immutably so.
Unless you defining terms such that the variations are not merely disorders but actually nonhuman, you are clearly wrong; human alignments of sex characteristics are non-binary though bimodal.
Doesn't really matter, for this purpose.
> I’d argue that humans are indeed binary sexed, and immutably so.
Unless you defining terms such that the variations are not merely disorders but actually nonhuman, you are clearly wrong; human alignments of sex characteristics are non-binary though bimodal.