Comment by danielchavez

We're hosting the photos on S3 currently, only around 30K photos currently and the cost of S3 is dependent on how frequently they are accessed (how often users load a specific photo). If I recall correctly our S3 bill last month was around 3 dollars but we don't have very many users. I'm sure its not scalable if we had tons of photos and tons of users but I think I'm just crossing that bridge if I ever get there