Comment by chrisseaton

> Happy to get back to that original subject if you are.

Original point is:

- RedHat has nothing to do with Silicon Valley - geographically nor culturally

- RedHat isn't representative of typical Silicon Valley companies

- IBM is more of a 'Silicon Valley' company than Red Hat, because it's an old traditional government contractor

Therefore the original comment had it backwards, which is confusing.

If you mean 'liberal young open-source company' then say that! Because that absolutely isn't what 'Silicon Valley' means.