Is it just me or is comment-flagging becoming the default means of disagreeing here?
Isn't that feature supposed to be reserved for anti-socially ridiculously deliberately offensive materials that need to be removed etc?
I'm also less and less convinced about this "points voting system" in which a downvote costs the downvoting person nothing, nor is any justification necessary.
I would like to see a flag require a submitted textual reason, and downvotes require a comment postulating a coherent and logical motive, that obviously needn't be agreed-upon, but some input of some kind to raise the bar needed to damage someone.
I'm also less and less convinced about this "points voting system" in which a downvote costs the downvoting person nothing, nor is any justification necessary.
I would like to see a flag require a submitted textual reason, and downvotes require a comment postulating a coherent and logical motive, that obviously needn't be agreed-upon, but some input of some kind to raise the bar needed to damage someone.