It seems like the thesis of this diatribe is that people recognized generally or in their own niche as intelligent may not be, which is supported by saying they expressed ideas which allow the author to call them trash, which means they aren’t smart after all.
Isn’t that a self-defeating argument? Recognition makes them noteworthy, but being wrong makes them notorious idiots?
Isn’t that a self-defeating argument? Recognition makes them noteworthy, but being wrong makes them notorious idiots?