It's very high-risk. I guess it's a philosophical question of whether you think the public deserves the right to take super high risks and invest in startups (1000x more risky than the public market given there is no secondary market).
On one hand you'd think the people with the least amount of money are the ones that need the options to take risks the MOST. To get out of their situation.
On the other hand, will this help them? Will the companies be good enough? Will they provide returns. Is helping 1% of people escape their situation worth it for the other 99% that will invest in startups that fail.
On one hand you'd think the people with the least amount of money are the ones that need the options to take risks the MOST. To get out of their situation.
On the other hand, will this help them? Will the companies be good enough? Will they provide returns. Is helping 1% of people escape their situation worth it for the other 99% that will invest in startups that fail.
Interesting