The error is using a pejorative term of FUD to identify uncertainties that are routine in every legal review ever performed. What you’re saying is you have a different risk assessment for your business and you’d take the advice and proceed anyway. That’s your prerogative. That does not extend to “different assessments from my own are objectively wrong,” which is what calling them FUD implies.
Engineers seek hard truth, which is why the malleable truth of contract and license law is ever elusive. They’re different takes on truth.
Engineers seek hard truth, which is why the malleable truth of contract and license law is ever elusive. They’re different takes on truth.