I’m another person, but: when I initially read an old version of it (about 4 years ago) I liked the comprehensiveness but disliked the tone. Perhaps due to not being a native english speaker, it distracted me and made it harder to get the point.
Quickly peering it it seems that it has been improved, although some things there remind me of what I felt, such as:
McCoy might report "It's MVC, Jim, but not as we know it". And you would respond "McCoy, you trouble maker, why even mention an OO pattern? re-frame is a functional framework."
This does not help me a lot; although I know about “the real mccoy” expression, I dont understand/enjoy that.
Quickly peering it it seems that it has been improved, although some things there remind me of what I felt, such as:
This does not help me a lot; although I know about “the real mccoy” expression, I dont understand/enjoy that.