I am not sure a Yelp-like system would work for the reasons others have mentioned.
I would suggest these metrics to help you evaluate a doc program from the outside:
Do early-stage grad students get (any) authorship credits together with professors or post docs? (Getting started)
Do they eventually get first author status? (Independence)
Do students go to conferences and read papers? Or does a prof just go and read all 10 from her institution? (Networking)
Do fresh doctors land post docs, tenure, or good private sector jobs? (Outcome)
A lot of this can be deduced by google (scholar) and scanning conference proceedings and video recordings.
(defended my doc in 2016 in Finland, been fairly succesful at post doc funding as well as private sector)
I would suggest these metrics to help you evaluate a doc program from the outside:
Do early-stage grad students get (any) authorship credits together with professors or post docs? (Getting started)
Do they eventually get first author status? (Independence)
Do students go to conferences and read papers? Or does a prof just go and read all 10 from her institution? (Networking)
Do fresh doctors land post docs, tenure, or good private sector jobs? (Outcome)
A lot of this can be deduced by google (scholar) and scanning conference proceedings and video recordings.
(defended my doc in 2016 in Finland, been fairly succesful at post doc funding as well as private sector)