Adversarial review with respect to the veracity of the paper author? Unless you're making claims that would upend the field, no, it does not involve any of that sort of review. "I spent 1000 hours taking notes in a dog park" is not an extraordinary claim.
We're saying the same things back and forth to each other at this point and can probably wrap it up.
We're saying the same things back and forth to each other at this point and can probably wrap it up.