I think you're going to find that most people commenting on this have never reviewed a journal article and don't understand the process. You see it in replication crisis threads as well: the belief that academic research is premised on reviewers replicating results before things get published.
The idea that academic journals are based on a presumption of good faith is totally alien to a lot of HN commenters.
The idea that academic journals are based on a presumption of good faith is totally alien to a lot of HN commenters.