> Have not messed with the UEFI bits they added in recent versions so it may be different now. But I doubt it.
So you have not looked into the modern way PCs boot operating systems (as in this century), that is UEFI.
Yet somehow you decide to assume Microsoft (which is predominantly not a PC-vendor) have somehow done something something to the PC firmware which boots Windows?
Am I understanding you correctly?
If you’re 100% ignorant about how modern PCs boot and work, why do you even comment as if your opinion will bring anything to the discussion?
And if you’d bother researching things, as opposed to merely holding meanings against them, you’d know UEFI is a firmware level solution to the multi-boot problem, so that operating systems don’t have to solve it each on their own, differently and incompatible.
It’s quite great actually.
So you have not looked into the modern way PCs boot operating systems (as in this century), that is UEFI.
Yet somehow you decide to assume Microsoft (which is predominantly not a PC-vendor) have somehow done something something to the PC firmware which boots Windows?
Am I understanding you correctly?
If you’re 100% ignorant about how modern PCs boot and work, why do you even comment as if your opinion will bring anything to the discussion?
And if you’d bother researching things, as opposed to merely holding meanings against them, you’d know UEFI is a firmware level solution to the multi-boot problem, so that operating systems don’t have to solve it each on their own, differently and incompatible.
It’s quite great actually.