I completely understand acquisitions that create value by providing economies of scale, monopoly power or network benefits, or diversify or complement a company's activities.
But for a European market leader to buy an American market leader in what is ultimately an extremely local business... I see no real added benefit here.
Few further economies of scale when you're already at continent-size for an ultimately "local" business, no monopoly or network benefits, and zero diversification.
If this were manufacturing or retail then benefits are pretty obvious.
But in this case, what am I missing? How on earth does this justify a 27 percent premium on GrubHub? It is purely a strategic defensive move to prevent Uber from buying it, and nothing more?
I completely understand acquisitions that create value by providing economies of scale, monopoly power or network benefits, or diversify or complement a company's activities.
But for a European market leader to buy an American market leader in what is ultimately an extremely local business... I see no real added benefit here.
Few further economies of scale when you're already at continent-size for an ultimately "local" business, no monopoly or network benefits, and zero diversification.
If this were manufacturing or retail then benefits are pretty obvious.
But in this case, what am I missing? How on earth does this justify a 27 percent premium on GrubHub? It is purely a strategic defensive move to prevent Uber from buying it, and nothing more?