> This is not a peer-reviewed research paper. It seems to be a project report likely done by undergraduates. The paper is full of typos and it is not clear what the specific novelty of the proposal is (if there is any).
This is not a constructive comment.
The URL suggests this is a final(?) project paper for MIT's 6.857: Computer and Network Security course. The paper seems appropriate in style and length for this kind of setting.
This is not a constructive comment.
The URL suggests this is a final(?) project paper for MIT's 6.857: Computer and Network Security course. The paper seems appropriate in style and length for this kind of setting.