Why would that cause instant censoring? It could go the other way too. Content doesn't get censored. No more games by websites like Twitter where they "accidentally" censor one political side over and over. (Or vice versa elsewhere.) The idea is that if these websites get special protections that regular people don't, and are big enough to essentially be the town square, then the values the society itself accepts are what should guide it. In this case that would be free speech.
Just to be clear, I'm not necessarily arguing for this. I'm just trying to explain how else this might work.
Just to be clear, I'm not necessarily arguing for this. I'm just trying to explain how else this might work.