> The planned const generics syntax is going to look pretty weird, because it builds on type generics. If Rust had chosen a different syntax for type generics, const generics might look less weird.
Could you provide an example? Because I don't really see it, except by requiring that non-const generics also be explicitly annotated?
Could you provide an example? Because I don't really see it, except by requiring that non-const generics also be explicitly annotated?