Comment

Comment by MaxBarraclough

> since YouTube is a general platform and that no serious alternatives exist, we should advocate for less censorship.

Disagree. Online misinformation can kill people [0] and act as a recruitment tool for Nazis [1]. Less seriously, it can result in people burning down 5G towers. There's plenty to lose by YouTube hosting this stuff, and they're under no obligation to do so in the name of free speech.

It strikes me as odd that more people seem to want YouTube to permit far-right propaganda on their platform, than want YouTube to permit 'adult content', which just about no-one advocates.

> YouTube is the only serious option at the moment for general video content

People don't have a positive right for their poisonous nonsense to be hosted by, and discoverable on, YouTube. Such content should be forced off mainstream platforms.

> if YouTube begins to aggressively censor opinions they disagree with

'Disagree with' is trivialising the problem. This stuff is serious.

[0] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/iran-700-dead-drinkin...

edit It's not clear to me whether [0] was the result of online misinformation.

[1] https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mbzzzx/youtube-decides-to...

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton